India's Steel Boom Faces a Carbon Challenge, Says Asia Research & Engagement

India must transform its steel production methods to meet growth and climate targets, as its current industry emissions threaten its ambition to become a green steel leader.


PTI | New Delhi | Updated: 20-05-2026 14:56 IST | Created: 20-05-2026 14:56 IST
India's Steel Boom Faces a Carbon Challenge, Says Asia Research & Engagement
This image is AI-generated and does not depict any real-life event or location. It is a fictional representation created for illustrative purposes only.

New Delhi, Delhi, India & Singapore – Business Wire India • India must change how steel is produced if it's to meet growth and climate targets simultaneously.

• Industry emissions well above global average, threatening India's ambition to become green steel leader.

• Transition Report Cards reveal mixed picture at India's largest steel companies, with Tata Steel and Jindal Stainless leading progress.

• India green steel transition moving beyond target-setting and into a contest over bankable delivery.

India cannot build its next phase of economic growth without steel. But it cannot achieve that growth and meet its long-term climate goals unless it changes how that steel is produced.

India has an ambitious target to boost crude steel capacity by almost 70% from 2023 figures to 300 million tonnes by 2030-31, requiring about USD105.5 billion in investment.

This poses a challenge for a nation that's committed to reaching its climate goals. Currently, India's steel production emissions are about 28% higher than the global industry average. If the country is to achieve its aim of becoming a global leader in green steel production and consumption, steel producers must move beyond ambition and target-setting and into an era of accountability and validation.

Without decisive and rapid action, the industry risks locking in high emissions for decades to come. The latest report from Asia Research & Engagement (ARE) – Forging Ahead: Pathways to Green Steel for India – outlines roadmaps for companies to achieve those goals, and measures progress by four of the country's largest producers: Tata Steel, JSW Steel, Jindal Steel, and Jindal Stainless.

Diverging strategies across major steelmakers.

ARE's analysis reveals a significant gap between companies that are advancing clear decarbonisation strategies and those still primarily expanding conventional capacity.

Among integrated producers, Tata Steel shows the most developed transition pathway, with visible progress in electric arc furnace (EAF) deployment, hydrogen pilots, and emissions disclosure. By contrast, peers remain earlier in the shift, with capital expenditure still largely tied to blast furnace-based expansion.

Jindal Stainless stands apart structurally, benefitting from a scrap and EAF-based production model that enables more immediate emissions reductions, though this reflects in-built differences in the product mix rather than a like-for-like transition across the sector.

''Some companies are beginning to articulate credible route-shift strategies and invest in enabling systems like clean power and scrap, while others remain more heavily anchored to conventional expansion,'' said Arun Kumar, Strategic Advisor – Power Markets & Technology Innovation, at ARE.

''The next phase of the steel transition will not be determined by long-term net-zero targets but by whether companies can deliver bankable, plant-level pathways that reduce emissions intensity while scaling production,'' Arun Kumar added.

These pathways include:.

• Clear production route choices.

• Capital allocation aligned with lower-emissions production.

• Time-bound implementation milestones.

• Robust measurement, reporting and verification systems capable of meeting regulatory and market requirements.

From ambition to execution.

The industry is already being reshaped by tightening domestic policy frameworks and global dynamics. The introduction of India's Green Steel Taxonomy creates a measurable benchmark for emissions performance and provides a clear distinction between credible green production and vague sustainability claims.

In parallel, the European Union's Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) is making emissions data a commercial requirement for exporters, increasing demand for plant-level, verifiable carbon accounting across supply chains.

For policymakers, the next step is to build demand through procurement standards and certification frameworks. For buyers, particularly in infrastructure and public projects, early signals can play a key role in scaling lower-emission steel production.

''India's steel transition is crystallising into a contest over bankable delivery, and credible execution will determine which companies emerge as leaders and those that fail to adapt,'' Kumar said.

For deeper analysis and complete assessment, download the complete report HERE.

About Asia Research & Engagement (ARE).

ARE brings leading investors into dialogue with Asian-listed companies to address sustainable development challenges and help companies align with investor priorities. With decades of Asia experience, our cross-cultural team understands the region's unique needs. Our high-quality independent research, robust investor network, and engagement expertise, provide corporate leaders and financial decision makers with insights leading to concrete action.

(This story has not been edited by Devdiscourse staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

Give Feedback