Federal Judge Blocks NSF's Funding Cuts: A Boost for University Research

A federal judge halted the National Science Foundation's policy to cap indirect research funding, ruling it arbitrary. The policy would have significantly reduced university funding, especially at major institutions. This decision is the latest in efforts against Trump's administration's attempts to reduce government research support.


Devdiscourse News Desk | Updated: 21-06-2025 05:06 IST | Created: 21-06-2025 05:06 IST
Federal Judge Blocks NSF's Funding Cuts: A Boost for University Research
This image is AI-generated and does not depict any real-life event or location. It is a fictional representation created for illustrative purposes only.

In a significant development for academic institutions, a federal judge has blocked the National Science Foundation (NSF) from implementing a policy that would have drastically reduced research funding. The policy, deemed arbitrary by U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani, limited the reimbursement rates for indirect facility and administrative costs related to grant-supported research.

NSF, responsible for disbursing approximately $9 billion in research funding, had introduced a controversial cap of 15% on indirect costs this past May. This change conflicted with traditional agreed-upon rates, which could reach up to 65% for certain universities. The Obama-appointed judge's decision is a rebuttal of the broader trend under President Donald Trump's administration to curtail research funds.

Leading universities and academic groups vocally opposed the policy, arguing it threatened the U.S.'s position as a global research leader. As NSF and other government departments face legal challenges, the impact of these funding cuts on scientific advancement remains uncertain.

(With inputs from agencies.)

Give Feedback