Sebi Reforms Simplify Investment Landscape for InvITs and REITs
Markets regulator Sebi has revised rules to harmonize the minimum allotment lot for infrastructure investment trusts in primary markets, aligning them with secondary market norms. Recent amendments are designed to ease the operational framework for InvITs and REITs, improving transparency and streamlining processes for investors.

- Country:
- India
The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) has implemented new rules, effectively reducing the minimum allotment lot for privately placed Infrastructure Investment Trusts (InvITs) in primary markets to Rs 25 lakh. This change aligns the primary market rules with those of the secondary market, where the trading lot size has already been capped at Rs 25 lakh.
Previously, minimum allotment in the primary market ranged significantly, requiring investors to commit either Rs 1 crore or Rs 25 crore based on asset mixes. This alignment brings uniformity across both markets. Additionally, Sebi has amended regulations to further streamline processes for both InvITs and Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs), enhancing business operations within these sectors.
Among key amendments is the classification of related parties of REITs and InvITs, distinguishing them from public categories unless categorized as Qualified Institutional Buyers (QIBs). This distinction provides a clearer market structure. Further updates include changes that allow holding companies to address negative cash flows before distributing funds to trusts, improving financial flexibility. The board also mandates synchronized timelines for the submission of crucial financial reports, harmonizing them with financial results submissions.
ALSO READ
Infrastructure Investment: The Financial Roadmap for Sustaining Growth
Godrej Interio Aims for Rs 10,000 Crore Revenue Boost with Rs 300 Crore Investment
SBI Chairman Emphasizes Need for Revitalized Private Investment
Jeweller Sentenced for Massive Gold Investment Fraud in Thane
Gurugram Man Arrested in Online Investment Fraud Case