Breaking the stigma: Social support is critical to mental health of adults living with HIV

The study defines HIV stigma as a multifaceted social disapproval manifesting in discrimination, self-isolation, fear of disclosure, and internalized shame. Despite advancements in HIV treatment and awareness, many individuals continue to face enacted, anticipated, or internalized stigma. This not only affects their social behaviors but can severely impact treatment adherence and emotional well-being.


CO-EDP, VisionRICO-EDP, VisionRI | Updated: 18-06-2025 18:28 IST | Created: 18-06-2025 18:28 IST
Breaking the stigma: Social support is critical to mental health of adults living with HIV
Representative Image. Credit: ChatGPT

A newly published study in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health has identified social support as a key buffer against the mental health effects of HIV-related stigma. The study, titled “Social Support as a Mediator in the Relationship Between Stigma and Mental Health in Adults Living with HIV”, concludes that while stigma alone does not directly harm mental health, it indirectly does so by eroding essential social support systems, which in turn precipitates emotional distress.

This research adds a crucial dimension to the public health understanding of HIV by linking psychological outcomes not just to clinical symptoms but to societal and interpersonal dynamics. With HIV stigma still prevalent in Latin America and beyond, these findings underscore the urgent need for interventions that strengthen support networks among people living with HIV (PLHIV).

How does stigma affect mental health in people living with HIV?

The study defines HIV stigma as a multifaceted social disapproval manifesting in discrimination, self-isolation, fear of disclosure, and internalized shame. Despite advancements in HIV treatment and awareness, many individuals continue to face enacted, anticipated, or internalized stigma. This not only affects their social behaviors but can severely impact treatment adherence and emotional well-being.

Using a mediation model, the researchers demonstrated that stigma was not directly associated with worse mental health outcomes (β = -0.08, p = 0.21). However, stigma significantly reduced perceived social support (β = -0.38, p < 0.001), and this loss of support was directly associated with poorer mental health (β = 0.27, p < 0.001). The total indirect effect of stigma on mental health through social support was statistically significant (β = -0.05, 95% CI [-0.09, -0.02]).

These findings challenge the assumption that stigma’s psychological toll is solely rooted in direct emotional injury. Instead, the study highlights how stigma systematically dismantles the social networks that typically serve as a source of emotional resilience. The absence of these connections leaves individuals more vulnerable to anxiety, depression, and reduced psychological well-being.

What role does social support play in mediating the effects of stigma?

Social support is defined in the study as the perceived presence of people, family, friends, or community members, who provide emotional, informational, or instrumental assistance. The researchers found that stigma undermines these networks by isolating individuals from meaningful social interactions and discouraging them from seeking help. As support systems collapse, mental health deteriorates.

This mediating effect was complete, meaning that stigma’s impact on mental health was fully channeled through the weakening of social support, rather than exerting a separate, direct psychological effect. In practical terms, this means that bolstering social support systems could neutralize the psychological harm caused by stigma.

Importantly, the study also identified vulnerable subgroups. More than 46% of participants identified as part of a sexual minority - a demographic already at higher risk for mental health disorders. For them, stigma operated along dual axes: their HIV status and their sexual identity. This dual stigmatization likely compounds the risk of emotional suffering, and further weakens access to dependable social networks.

The protective nature of social support is supported by existing literature cited in the study. Prior research has shown that strong social networks can reduce depression, improve treatment adherence, enhance self-esteem, and decrease suicidal ideation among people living with HIV. This new study reaffirms these benefits, contextualizing them within a broader biopsychosocial framework that integrates societal, psychological, and cultural variables in health outcomes.

What are the implications for mental health policy and HIV care strategies?

The study’s findings offer actionable insights for policymakers, healthcare providers, and community-based organizations. First, public health programs should focus on integrating social support development into HIV care strategies. This includes community outreach, peer-support networks, and family education programs designed to reduce stigma and rebuild trust.

Second, mental health professionals working with PLHIV should assess not only clinical symptoms but also levels of perceived support and stigmatization. Psychological counseling, support groups, and family therapy could be crucial interventions. Given that stigma indirectly undermines mental health by weakening social connections, therapy should emphasize re-engagement and social reintegration.

Third, HIV-related stigma should be addressed systemically. Institutional policies must discourage discriminatory behavior in healthcare settings, ensure confidentiality, and promote respectful treatment of all patients. Anti-stigma campaigns at the national and regional level, especially in high-burden countries like Peru, can help reshape public perceptions and foster a more inclusive environment for PLHIV.

The researchers acknowledge certain limitations in their study, including the use of a non-probabilistic sample from a single hospital and reliance on self-reported data. However, the robust sample size and validated instruments used for stigma, social support, and mental health measures lend strength to the findings. Additionally, all participants were receiving antiretroviral treatment, which standardized a critical aspect of HIV care and allowed for more focused analysis of psychosocial factors.

Future research, the authors suggest, should explore the longitudinal effects of social support and evaluate targeted interventions that could buffer the stigma-mental health link over time. They also recommend expanding the investigation to diverse geographical and cultural settings to improve generalizability and effectiveness of stigma-reduction strategies.

  • FIRST PUBLISHED IN:
  • Devdiscourse
Give Feedback