Godhra Case Controversy: The Battle for Acquittal
The Gujarat government opposed a plea for acquittal by Abdul Raheman Dhantiya in the 2002 Godhra train burning case, accusing him of inciting a violent mob. Dhantiya disputes his conviction, citing unreliable testimonies. The Supreme Court will continue hearing the case focusing on allegations of broader conspiracy.

- Country:
- India
The Gujarat government has challenged the plea for acquittal filed by Abdul Raheman Dhantiya in the 2002 Godhra train burning case, arguing that Dhantiya incited a violent mob to chant anti-India slogans.
The state's counsel presented evidence linking Dhantiya to the mob, which allegedly engaged in stone-pelting before the tragic fire that resulted in 58 deaths. The state insists his participation in such events cannot be condoned.
Dhantiya, a former municipal leader, claims innocence and highlights the prosecution's reliance on a witness he deems unreliable. The Supreme Court is set to resume hearings, focusing on the alleged conspiracy behind the incident.
(With inputs from agencies.)
ALSO READ
UK Supreme Court's Ruling Raises Concerns Over Trans Rights and Legal Clarity
JSW Steel Faces Legal Hurdle as Supreme Court Orders Liquidation of Bhushan Steel and Power Ltd
Justice Calls for Reform in 'Chief Justice Centric' Supreme Court
Justice Oka Calls for Transformation in Supreme Court Dynamics
Landmark Supreme Court Directive: Overhaul of CAPFs Promotion Framework