Godhra Case Controversy: The Battle for Acquittal

The Gujarat government opposed a plea for acquittal by Abdul Raheman Dhantiya in the 2002 Godhra train burning case, accusing him of inciting a violent mob. Dhantiya disputes his conviction, citing unreliable testimonies. The Supreme Court will continue hearing the case focusing on allegations of broader conspiracy.


Devdiscourse News Desk | New Delhi | Updated: 07-05-2025 20:51 IST | Created: 07-05-2025 20:51 IST
Godhra Case Controversy: The Battle for Acquittal
This image is AI-generated and does not depict any real-life event or location. It is a fictional representation created for illustrative purposes only.
  • Country:
  • India

The Gujarat government has challenged the plea for acquittal filed by Abdul Raheman Dhantiya in the 2002 Godhra train burning case, arguing that Dhantiya incited a violent mob to chant anti-India slogans.

The state's counsel presented evidence linking Dhantiya to the mob, which allegedly engaged in stone-pelting before the tragic fire that resulted in 58 deaths. The state insists his participation in such events cannot be condoned.

Dhantiya, a former municipal leader, claims innocence and highlights the prosecution's reliance on a witness he deems unreliable. The Supreme Court is set to resume hearings, focusing on the alleged conspiracy behind the incident.

(With inputs from agencies.)

Give Feedback