Supreme Court's New Mandate: Three Years Practice Needed for Judicial Exams
The Supreme Court ruled that fresh law graduates cannot appear in judicial services examinations without a minimum of three years of legal practice. This decision aims to ensure judicial efficiency and competence, addressing challenges faced due to the direct appointment of inexperienced graduates, as reported by various high courts.

- Country:
- India
The Supreme Court announced on Tuesday that fresh law graduates will no longer be eligible to appear for judicial services exams without at least three years of legal practice. This ruling is expected to impact aspiring judicial candidates significantly.
A bench consisting of Chief Justice B R Gavai and Justice Augustine George Masih emphasized the necessity of courtroom exposure for budding judges. Chief Justice Gavai stated that appointing fresh graduates had led to significant issues, as noted by several high courts. He further stressed that practical courtroom experience is crucial for maintaining judicial efficiency and competence.
The bench mandated that candidates must have a minimum of three years of legal experience to apply for entry-level civil judge positions. This judgement arose from a plea by the All India Judges Association, highlighting the practical challenges that have surfaced due to directly enlisting inexperienced graduates in judiciary roles. The full detailed judgement is still awaited.
(With inputs from agencies.)
ALSO READ
Chief Justice B R Gavai: Upholding Justice and Diversity in India
Chief Justice Gavai's Visit Highlights Protocol Missteps in Maharashtra
Chief Justice Kait Reflects on Milestones Achieved in Legal Career
Breaking Barriers: Justice BV Nagarathna Set to Make History as First Woman Chief Justice of India
Justice Calls for Reform in 'Chief Justice Centric' Supreme Court