Federal Trade Court Halts Trump's Tariff Power Grab
A federal trade court has blocked President Trump from applying broad tariffs under emergency powers, finding he overstepped his authority. Seven lawsuits challenged this core of Trump's trade policy, arguing the 1977 law cited does not permit tariffs, and that a trade deficit isn’t an extraordinary threat.

- Country:
- United States
A federal trade court delivered a significant rebuff to President Donald Trump on Wednesday, blocking his administration from implementing broad tariffs on imports under an emergency-powers law. The ruling, issued by a three-judge panel, highlighted the overreach in Trump's use of authority according to several plaintiffs.
This decision comes amid at least seven lawsuits challenging the tariffs, which have been a cornerstone of Trump's trade policy until now. Typically, tariffs require Congressional approval, but Trump claimed the authority to act independently, citing national trade deficits as a national emergency.
The plaintiffs argued that the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEPPA) does not authorize the use of tariffs, and even if it did, the trade deficit does not meet the criteria of an "unusual and extraordinary threat." This ruling marks a pivotal moment in the ongoing debate over the President's trade policies, given the U.S. has experienced trade deficits for nearly half a century.
(With inputs from agencies.)
ALSO READ
Pound Soars Amid Trade Policy Uncertainty
Euro Ascends Amid U.S. Trade Policy Reversal
German Bond Yields Droop Amid US Trade Policy Concerns
Economic Uncertainty: Euro Zone Bond Yields Plunge Amid U.S. Trade Policy Impact
Global Markets Stirred by Trade Policy Drama: A Week of Gains Amidst Uncertainty