UK Court Upholds F-35 Jet Part Exports to Israel amid Legal Challenge

Human rights groups lost a legal challenge against the UK government's supply of F-35 jet parts to Israel, arguing it violates humanitarian law. Despite suspending some export licenses for Gaza-related military gear, judges ruled national security trumps judicial intervention, underlining executive accountability to Parliament.


Devdiscourse News Desk | London | Updated: 30-06-2025 17:37 IST | Created: 30-06-2025 17:37 IST
UK Court Upholds F-35 Jet Part Exports to Israel amid Legal Challenge
This image is AI-generated and does not depict any real-life event or location. It is a fictional representation created for illustrative purposes only.
  • Country:
  • United Kingdom

Human rights groups faced a significant legal setback on Monday when their challenge against the British government's supply of military equipment to Israel was dismissed. The court decision permits the continued export of parts for F-35 fighter jets, despite allegations of complicity in illegal actions against Palestinians.

The legal action was led by the Palestinian organization Al-Haq and the UK-based Global Legal Action Network, which claimed the exports breached both domestic and international laws. They emphasized the moral and legal implications of supplying components that could be used in conflict zones, such as the Gaza Strip.

However, the court sided with the government, citing national security concerns. Judges stated the decision-making process around defense cooperation with the US and other allies is the purview of the executive branch, accountable to Parliament and the public, rather than the judiciary. The court's ruling underscores the complex balance between international trade commitments and ethical considerations in arms exports.

(With inputs from agencies.)

Give Feedback