Supreme Court Clarifies Stand on 'Udaipur Files' Film Release
The Supreme Court clarified its lack of a written order on refusing urgent plea listing against the film 'Udaipur Files'. The court only observed, 'Let the film be released', creating confusion. This decision may prejudice the trial of accused Mohammed Javed, who challenged the film's communal portrayal.

- Country:
- India
The Supreme Court, on Thursday, clarified it had not issued any written order while refusing to prioritize the plea against the screening of 'Udaipur Files: Kanhaiya Lal tailor murder'.
Senior advocate Kapil Sibal, representing accused Mohammed Javed, sought clarification after a bench's remark, 'Let the film be released', led to confusion.
Justice Bagchi expressed that the film should not be shown, while Justice Dhulia noted the court's observation was merely verbal, not warranting urgent listing.
(With inputs from agencies.)
Advertisement
ALSO READ
Cash discovery row: I will have to constitute a bench, CJI tells senior advocate Kapil Sibal, who mentioned matter for Justice Yashwant Varma.
Cash discovery: Kapil Sibal tells SC that in-house inquiry panel's recommendation for removal of Justice Yashwant Varma is unconstitutional.
If CJI has material that there is misconduct, he can inform President, PM: SC to Justice Yashwant Varma's lawyer Kapil Sibal.
Kapil Sibal tells SC that Justice Yashwant Varma did not approach earlier as tape was released and his reputation was already damaged.
Recommendation of proceedings for removal in this manner would set a dangerous precedent: Kapil Sibal tells SC on Justice Varma matter.