Federal Appeals Court Dismisses NRA's Free Speech Lawsuit

A federal appeals court dismissed the NRA's lawsuit against a New York state official, Maria Vullo, for allegedly violating its free speech rights by discouraging banks from associating with it. Vullo had immunity under the First Amendment. The Supreme Court previously allowed the NRA to pursue the case.


Devdiscourse News Desk | Updated: 17-07-2025 20:01 IST | Created: 17-07-2025 20:01 IST
Federal Appeals Court Dismisses NRA's Free Speech Lawsuit
This image is AI-generated and does not depict any real-life event or location. It is a fictional representation created for illustrative purposes only.

The National Rifle Association's lawsuit against a New York state official, alleging free speech violations, has been dismissed by a federal appeals court. The decision by the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals cleared Maria Vullo, a former superintendent of New York's Department of Financial Services, citing her qualified immunity under the U.S. Constitution's First Amendment.

In 2018, Vullo encouraged banks and insurance companies to weigh the 'reputational risks' when dealing with gun rights groups, following a mass shooting in Parkland, Florida. The NRA argued that this amounted to unlawful retaliation against its advocacy.

The U.S. Supreme Court had previously allowed the NRA to pursue its case, overturning an earlier decision by the 2nd Circuit. However, it did not decide on Vullo's immunity from being sued. Both parties' legal representatives have yet to comment on the recent ruling.

(With inputs from agencies.)

Give Feedback