Controversy Unfolds: BCG's Involvement with Gaza Humanitarian Foundation
An investigation revealed that Boston Consulting Group (BCG) sidestepped risk controls to work with Gaza Humanitarian Foundation. Despite its intentions, GHF faced criticisms for militarizing aid and BCG's internal processes were questioned. This led to controversy, especially after failing to release a complete investigation report.

Boston Consulting Group (BCG) finds itself at the center of controversy after a commissioned investigation uncovered that some U.S.-based staff bypassed company risk controls. The violations were related to work with the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), triggering discussions on the firm's internal processes.
GHF, which began supplying humanitarian aid in Gaza, attracted criticism for bypassing traditional channels and faced allegations of militarizing aid distribution. As violence erupted near distribution sites, humanitarian groups, including the U.N., distanced themselves from GHF, questioning its neutrality.
BCG's involvement has not only raised questions about its internal management but also heightened speculation after it decided not to disclose the full findings of an investigation by law firm WilmerHale. The consulting firm expressed regret over not adhering to their standards, further intensifying scrutiny.
(With inputs from agencies.)