Court Ruling Confirms VAT Approach in Ride-Hailing Dispute

The Supreme Court has dismissed Uber's appeal for their rival taxi operators to face a 20% VAT charge outside London. This decision upholds the existing ruling that private hire operators do not enter into direct contracts with passengers and are not required to charge VAT as Uber does.


Devdiscourse News Desk | Updated: 29-07-2025 17:37 IST | Created: 29-07-2025 17:37 IST
Court Ruling Confirms VAT Approach in Ride-Hailing Dispute
This image is AI-generated and does not depict any real-life event or location. It is a fictional representation created for illustrative purposes only.

In a significant judgment on Tuesday, the Supreme Court dismissed Uber's appeal to impose a 20% VAT charge on rival taxi operators outside London. This decision maintains the status quo, where operators do not enter direct contracts with passengers and are not liable for the VAT.

Uber sought this change following a 2021 Supreme Court ruling that made its drivers eligible for minimum wage and holiday pay, thus subjecting Uber to VAT. The High Court had initially ruled in Uber's favor, but the decision was reversed by the Court of Appeal in July 2024, backing rival operators Delta Taxis and Veezu.

Delta Taxis' legal representative, Layla Barke Jones, hailed the ruling as averting a potential crisis for many private operators. This verdict, along with a separate decision benefiting Bolt from VAT imposition, highlights a pressing call for a unified regulatory framework across the UK.

(With inputs from agencies.)

Give Feedback