Delhi High Court Upholds Medha Patkar's Conviction in 23-Year-Old Defamation Case
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of activist Medha Patkar in a defamation case filed in 2000 by Delhi LG V K Saxena. The court found no legal flaws in the trial court's decision, maintaining Patkar's probation but modifying its conditions. Patkar's plea for an additional witness was also rejected.

- Country:
- India
The Delhi High Court has upheld the conviction of Medha Patkar in a 23-year-old defamation lawsuit filed by Delhi LG V K Saxena. The court found no illegality in the original trial court's decision, rejecting Patkar's appeals for reconsideration.
The decision maintained the verdict of releasing Patkar on probation, although it modified the terms to allow virtual or lawyer representation for periodic appearances. This ruling followed Saxena's accusation that Patkar defamed him in a press release, which was deemed to harm his public service reputation.
Attempts by Patkar to introduce a new witness were dismissed by the court, which stood firm on the original and sessions court findings of her guilt in the defamation case. The case serves as a significant legal precedent in handling defamation suits involving public figures.
(With inputs from agencies.)
ALSO READ
Controversial Voting Law Sparks Democracy Debate in New Zealand
BJD MPs Decry Law and Order Decline in BJP-led Odisha
Khadse Claims Conspiracy: Son-in-law's Arrest in Drug Case as Defamation Ploy
Supreme Court: Protecting Lawyer-Client Privilege Amidst Investigation Pressures
Ukraine's Silenced Parliament: Lawmakers Turn to Social Media Amid Crisis