Sanctions Grip: Shvidler's Supreme Court Defeat

Billionaire Eugene Shvidler lost his appeal against British sanctions related to Russia's Ukraine invasion, affecting his business and personal life. Despite his denial of ties to Russian politics, the UK defended its sanctions regime. The ruling has broader implications for individuals sanctioned without firm links to the Putin regime.


Devdiscourse News Desk | Updated: 29-07-2025 19:51 IST | Created: 29-07-2025 19:51 IST
Sanctions Grip: Shvidler's Supreme Court Defeat
This image is AI-generated and does not depict any real-life event or location. It is a fictional representation created for illustrative purposes only.

Billionaire oil tycoon Eugene Shvidler faced a setback on Tuesday as the UK's Supreme Court dismissed his appeal against British sanctions, a decision tied to Moscow's invasion of Ukraine.

Shvidler, associated with Roman Abramovich and involved with the Russian steel company Evraz, argued the sanctions were unfair, especially when compared to other entities with significant Russian ties that remain unsanctioned. The court, however, upheld the original decision, emphasizing the validity of the UK's sanctions regime.

The ruling, which was met with both support and criticism, highlights ongoing tensions around the effectiveness and fairness of international punitive measures. Industry experts suggest this decision could complicate future challenges to similar sanctions.

(With inputs from agencies.)

Give Feedback