High Court Denies Petition on Aviation Reporting Guidelines
The Madras High Court dismissed a petition calling for guidelines to prevent speculative aviation-related media reporting. Advocate M Pravin filed the petition, highlighting the issue of media attributing blame prematurely to pilots, which can harm their reputation and mental well-being. No regulatory action has been taken yet.

- Country:
- India
The Madras High Court has dismissed a petition seeking to establish guidelines for aviation media reporting to prevent premature speculation. Filed by advocate M Pravin, the case urged regulatory safeguards against unverified blame directed at pilots in the aftermath of aviation incidents.
Pravin contended that following such incidents, media outlets often publish unverified content that harms pilots' reputations and mental health, using the example of a June 2025 aviation accident. He called for advisories, the enforcement of confidentiality protocols, and content moderation guidelines.
Despite the serious implications for aviation safety and media integrity, the court noted no meaningful regulatory measures have been implemented. The plea highlighted the need to uphold principles like the presumption of innocence and protect pilots' dignity under constitutional rights.
(With inputs from agencies.)
ALSO READ
Uttar Pradesh to Frame Guidelines for Police Conduct in Litigation Matters
Calcutta High Court Sets Guidelines for Trinamool Congress' Martyrs' Day Rally
Arunachal Pradesh Sets Landmark Guidelines for Child Protection
NDMC's New Guidelines for Khan Market's Aesthetic Overhaul
Supreme Court issues guidelines to protect mental health of students in colleges, coaching centres