Wikipedia vs. Britain's Online Safety Act: A Legal Battle Reinforces Free Speech Concerns
The Wikimedia Foundation lost a legal challenge against Britain's Online Safety Act, which demands verifying users' identities. Though a judge dismissed the case, future challenges are possible if Ofcom enforces stringent duties on Wikipedia. The government defends the law as essential for online safety.
The Wikimedia Foundation, operator of Wikipedia, faced a legal setback as its challenge against parts of the UK's Online Safety Act was dismissed by London's High Court on Monday. The act is criticized for potentially infringing on free speech by enforcing strict online platform requirements.
The Foundation argued that being labeled under 'Category 1 duties' would necessitate verifying users' identities, drastically affecting British users' access to Wikipedia. Despite the dismissal, Judge Jeremy Johnson noted Wikimedia could contest further if regulator Ofcom incorrectly categorizes Wikipedia as Tier 1.
While the court's ruling didn't grant immediate protections Wikimedia sought, it emphasized Ofcom and the government's responsibilities to safeguard Wikipedia. Meanwhile, the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology applauded the judgment, perceiving it as pivotal in creating a safer online realm under the new law.
(With inputs from agencies.)
Google News