Transatlantic Tension: The UN Peacekeeper Dilemma in Lebanon
The future of UN peacekeepers in Lebanon, known as UNIFIL, is causing a rift between the United States and its European allies. As the mandate nears its expiration, the US seeks to end the operation, citing inefficiency, while European nations urge for its extension to maintain stability.
- Country:
- United States
Disagreements over the future of UN peacekeeping forces in Lebanon have highlighted a rift between the United States and its European allies. The UN Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL), responsible for maintaining peace in southern Lebanon, faces uncertainty as its mandate expires soon, requiring renewal from the UN Security Council.
The mission, established post-1978 after Israel's invasion of southern Lebanon, was expanded following the 2006 confrontation between Israel and Hezbollah. Critics, including members of President Trump's administration, view UNIFIL as inefficient and costly, advocating for its termination despite opposition from European nations like France and Italy.
European countries argue that ending UNIFIL could destabilize the region, citing past instances like Mali, where premature withdrawal of peacekeepers led to security vacuums. As negotiations continue, the outcome remains uncertain, with options including downsizing or using technology to enhance monitoring capabilities.
(With inputs from agencies.)
Google News