Controversy over Alina Habba's Appointment as U.S. Attorney for New Jersey Sparks Legal Challenges
A U.S. judge has ruled Alina Habba's appointment as acting U.S. Attorney for New Jersey as unlawful, affecting ongoing cases. The decision challenges the Trump administration's attempts to extend her tenure and could impact numerous federal cases. The Justice Department plans to appeal, citing the need to protect her position.

A United States judge ruled against Alina Habba's appointment as the acting U.S. Attorney for New Jersey, determining it was made unlawfully. This decision presents a significant hurdle for the Trump administration's Justice Department, which sought to extend her interim tenure beyond 120 days.
The ruling arose from challenges by defendants in two federal cases, questioning if Habba was legally performing her duties. U.S. District Judge Matthew Brann found that her actions might be declared void, impacting numerous ongoing cases in New Jersey.
The Justice Department swiftly announced plans to appeal, with U.S. Attorney General Pamela Bondi defending Habba's work. The case underscores the contentious nature of political appointments and has potential ramifications for federal prosecutions in New Jersey.
(With inputs from agencies.)
ALSO READ
Justice Department Releases Epstein-Related Transcripts Amid Transparency Criticism
The Epstein Files: Justice Department Transparency in Question
Ajay Singh Secures Third Term as BFI President Amid Legal Challenges
Shinawatra Dynasty Faces Crucial Legal Challenges Amidst Political Turmoil
Judge Rules Against Unlawful Appointment: A Blow to Trump's Justice Department