Judge Rules Against Trump Lawyer's Appointment: A Legal Setback
A U.S. judge ruled that Alina Habba was unlawfully appointed as U.S. Attorney for New Jersey, impacting ongoing federal cases. The ruling challenges procedural moves by Trump's Justice Department and underscores the importance of lawful appointments. The Justice Department plans to appeal the decision, highlighting political tensions.
In a significant legal defeat for the Trump administration, a U.S. judge declared Alina Habba's appointment as acting U.S. Attorney for New Jersey unlawful on Thursday, impacting her participation in ongoing cases. This decision marks a blow to the Justice Department's efforts to maintain Habba's position despite judicial pushback.
Judge Matthew Brann's ruling stems from challenges brought by defendants in separate drug and fraud cases. These defendants contended that procedural maneuvers by the Trump administration to extend Habba's tenure were invalid. Brann's decision may void actions she took since her appointment, including approving indictments.
The ruling may stall hundreds of federal criminal cases in New Jersey. Attorney General Pamela Bondi vowed an immediate appeal, asserting Habba's work is crucial. The case exposes tensions between the judiciary and executive, as the Trump administration faces accusations of politically motivated appointments.
(With inputs from agencies.)
Google News