Supreme Court Advocates Aggressive Sterilization to Curb Stray Dog Population
The Supreme Court has emphasized the need for aggressive sterilization of stray dogs to control their population. The court acknowledged successful reduction in towns like Dehradun and Lucknow. The decision aims to balance stray dogs' rights and citizens' safety, modifying previous directives deemed too harsh.

- Country:
- India
The Supreme Court stressed the importance of aggressive sterilization of stray dogs to curb their population growth, aiming to ensure citizen safety. A three-judge bench led by Justice Vikram Nath acknowledged past successes with sterilization in towns like Dehradun and Lucknow.
Though ideal conditions are scarce, the court modified earlier directives that were considered overly harsh, allowing the release of stray dogs post-sterilization and de-worming. The decision addresses safety concerns amidst cases of rabid dog attacks.
The court's order arose from a suo motu case highlighting the threat posed by stray dogs, particularly in urban areas. It seeks a balance between animal rights and public safety after protests followed the earlier August 11 directive.
(With inputs from agencies.)