Controversy Unfolds: Former Judge's Salwa Judum Verdict Sparks Debate

Senior BJP leader Ravi Shankar Prasad criticized the 2011 Salwa Judum verdict by retired Justice B Sudershan Reddy, labeling it as pro-Maoist. Reddy, the opposition’s vice-presidential candidate, faces scrutiny for his past rulings. Amit Shah echoed these criticisms, inciting a broader debate on judicial decisions and political alignments.


Devdiscourse News Desk | Patna | Updated: 25-08-2025 16:44 IST | Created: 25-08-2025 16:44 IST
Controversy Unfolds: Former Judge's Salwa Judum Verdict Sparks Debate
Ravi Shankar Prasad
  • Country:
  • India

Senior BJP leader Ravi Shankar Prasad raised concerns on Monday regarding the Salwa Judum verdict issued by retired Supreme Court judge B Sudershan Reddy, who is now the INDIA bloc's vice-presidential candidate. Prasad accused the ruling of demonstrating an inclination towards Maoism.

Justice B Sudershan Reddy, along with Justice SS Nijjar, had ordered the disbanding of Salwa Judum in 2011, ruling it illegal to use tribal youths as Special Police Officers in the anti-Maoist fight. Prasad highlighted this judgement as reflecting Reddy's alleged pro-Maoist stance.

Prasad and Amit Shah criticized Reddy's verdict, arguing it hampered efforts against Maoism. Despite previous government support for Salwa Judum, Reddy's nomination by the opposition has reignited discussions. Eighteen retired judges criticized these attacks, urging an end to name-calling while defending judicial review rights.

(With inputs from agencies.)

Give Feedback