Governors' Autonomy: The Power Struggle Over Bill Assent
The Supreme Court of India examined the issue of governors and the President's autonomy in assenting to state assembly bills. BJP-ruled states emphasized the constitutional powers of these offices, asserting that courts cannot prescribe timelines for their decisions, nor can there be deemed assent to bills.

- Country:
- India
In a significant legal discourse, the Supreme Court of India was presented with arguments defending the constitutional autonomy of governors and the President in granting assent to bills passed by state assemblies. Some BJP-ruled states have asserted that this prerogative cannot be influenced or expedited by judicial mandates.
The five-judge Constitution bench, led by Chief Justice B R Gavai, heard submissions emphasizing that the power to assent to legislative bills is solely vested in governors and the President, with no place for judicial intervention in setting timelines or presumed assent.
Legal experts, representing various states, contended that the judiciary does not hold authority to compel governors to expedite decisions on bills, reinforcing that such actions are grounded in a constitutional framework that allows these offices discretion without the imposition of judicial timelines.
(With inputs from agencies.)
ALSO READ
Court Declares Pennsylvania's Mail-In Ballot Date Law Unconstitutional
People must protect their right to vote to safeguard Constitution: Rahul Gandhi
Constitutional Battles: Allegations Against Modi Government's Legal Maneuvers
RSS does not respect Constitution because it guarantees equal rights to everyone, alleges Rahul Gandhi in Bihar rally.
If we lose our voting rights, we cannot protect our Constitution: Rahul Gandhi in Bihar rally.