Judicial Immunity Tested: Wisconsin Judge Faces Trial for Aiding Migrant
A Wisconsin judge, Hannah Dugan, faces trial after being denied criminal immunity for allegedly helping a migrant evade arrest. The case highlights tensions between state and federal authority as it coincides with the Trump administration's enhanced immigration enforcement. Dugan has pled not guilty, challenging federal jurisdiction claims.

A Wisconsin judge, Hannah Dugan, cannot claim immunity from criminal charges related to her alleged role in helping a migrant evade arrest, a federal judge ruled on Tuesday. This decision sets the stage for a possible trial.
The ruling by U.S. District Judge Lynn Adelman dismissed Dugan's defense that she was acting within her judicial capacity. Adelman emphasized that judicial immunity does not cover criminal cases arising from actions like obstructing immigration enforcement.
Dugan, who is charged with obstruction and concealment for allegedly assisting a domestic violence suspect, has pled not guilty. Her case has garnered attention amid increased immigration arrests under the Trump administration, spotlighting the conflict between federal and state authorities.
(With inputs from agencies.)
ALSO READ
Judge Overrules Trump Administration's Unusual Lawsuit Against Maryland Judiciary
Controversy Over Trump Administration's Climate Change Proposal
Fed Leadership in Flux: Trump Administration's Deliberations
Supreme Court Decisions Shape Trump Administration's Immigration and Policy Moves
Controversy Brews Over Proposed Bill Targeting Leaders with Criminal Charges