Supreme Court Criticizes Early Bail Hearing Request in High-Profile Extortion Case
The Supreme Court criticized Leena Paulose for seeking expeditious bail hearing in a Rs 200 crore extortion case. The bench highlighted the problem of routinely approaching the apex court for early case hearings. Paulose's husband, Sukesh Chandrashekar, faces multiple investigations, including a money laundering case.

- Country:
- India
On Wednesday, the Supreme Court criticized Leena Paulose, the wife of alleged conman Sukesh Chandrashekar, for seeking a swift hearing of her bail plea at the Delhi High Court regarding a Rs 200 crore extortion case.
The judicial bench, consisting of Justices Dipankar Datta and Prashant Kumar Mishra, expressed concern over the growing trend of petitioners approaching the Supreme Court for expedited hearings, noting that this practice is not acceptable. The Supreme Court aims to curb the frequent requests for rescheduled hearings.
Paulose's legal representative argued that despite the matter being listed daily in the high court, hearings were not progressing. The Supreme Court proceeded to adjourn the issue. Meanwhile, Chandrashekar and Paulose are embroiled in multiple legal proceedings, including charges under the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act and allegations of using hawala networks and shell companies to hide illegal earnings from the extortion scheme.
ALSO READ
Delhi High Court Issues Notice to MP Moitra Over Rottweiler Custody Dispute
Delhi High Court Demands Timely EV Subsidy Disbursal
Delhi High Court Questions Gag Order in High-Profile Pet Custody Battle
Delhi High Court Upholds Denial of Bail in 2020 Riots Case
Delhi High Court Denies Bail in 2020 Riot Conspiracy Case