Ukrainian Law Enforcement Tensions Resurface Amid Political Crisis
A political crisis in Ukraine reignited due to tensions between major law enforcement bodies. The SBU security service and anti-corruption agencies are locked in a public feud. Controversy centers on allegations of illegal enrichment and autonomy measures, drawing international scrutiny and highlighting agency polarisation.

Tensions have reignited in Ukraine's political landscape following a fresh dispute between key law enforcement agencies. This week, the SBU security service accused anti-corruption watchdogs of targeting a former high-ranking agent, thrusting the nation into another crisis.
The feud initially erupted when the SBU arrested two anti-corruption officials with alleged ties to Russia. This was seen as a challenge by Kyiv to ensure its European allies that it was addressing corruption even amid ongoing conflict. This week, NABU charged the SBU's ex-cyber-security chief with illegal enrichment, claiming he acquired a Kyiv apartment at a suspiciously low price using illicit funds.
In response, the SBU slammed the charges as groundless and retaliatory. The broader issue of curbing the independence of NABU and SAPO, agencies created post-2014 to combat corruption, has incited fierce public outcry and international critique. President Zelenskiy has even been forced to restore powers to these bodies amid warnings from Western allies monitoring Ukraine's anti-corruption drive. The ongoing standoff underscores the deep-seated polarisation within Ukraine's law enforcement apparatus.
(With inputs from agencies.)
ALSO READ
Schreiber: Home Affairs Winning Fight Against Corruption and State Capture
Junior Engineer Caught in Bribery Scandal: The Price of Corruption
Allegations of Corruption in West Bengal's SLST Exam
Don't approve independent probes into corruption charges: Railway Board to Zones
Himachal Board Corruption Scandal: The Overnight Registration Fiasco