Supreme Court Calls for Judicial Performance Evaluation
The Supreme Court has expressed concerns about some high court judges not performing effectively, prompting a call for 'performance evaluation.' This follows delayed verdicts on criminal appeals. The court emphasized the need for judges to manage case loads efficiently without unnecessary adjournments and adhere to judgment timelines.

- Country:
- India
The Supreme Court has raised alarms over the inefficiencies of some high court judges, suggesting the need for a structured performance evaluation system. Justices Surya Kant and N Kotiswar Singh underscored the importance of timely judicial processes, aiming to prevent case files from piling up due to procrastination or mismanagement.
The bench highlighted discrepancies in the handling of criminal appeals, where the failure to deliver timely verdicts has profound implications, particularly for life and death row convicts. While the Jharkhand high court eventually acquitted several convicts, the delays underscore systemic issues that require introspection and reform.
Advocate Fauzia Shakil's presentation revealed inconsistencies in judgment delivery across high courts. Justice Kant noted the detrimental impact of judges repeatedly adjourning cases, urging a balance in handling workloads efficiently. The court stands firm on upholding a mandated timeline for delivering comprehensive judgments to maintain justice integrity.
(With inputs from agencies.)