Supreme Court Rebukes Trial Judge for Abdication of Jurisdiction
The Supreme Court criticized a trial court judge in Alipore, West Bengal, for surrendering jurisdiction over a criminal case due to time limits for case disposal lapsed. The judge failed to seek an extension and mistakenly believed he lost jurisdiction, prompting the Supreme Court to demand an explanation.

- Country:
- India
The Supreme Court has sharply criticized a trial court judge for relinquishing jurisdiction in a criminal case following the lapse of a timeline set by the apex court for case disposal.
A bench comprising Justices Pankaj Mithal and P B Varale observed that on January 18, 2024, the Supreme Court, in its judgment on a criminal appeal, directed a judicial magistrate in Alipore, South 24 Parganas, West Bengal, to conclude the case within four weeks. However, the trial judge, failing to meet this deadline, chose to abdicate jurisdiction on March 19, 2024.
The Supreme Court expressed dissatisfaction with the judge's decision, emphasizing that the judge's recourse should have been to request an extension of time. The apex court ordered the district judge to seek an explanation from the trial judge and report back within a month, while also notifying authorities about the order and scheduling the next hearing for October 27.
(With inputs from agencies.)
ALSO READ
Rising Tide: West Bengal's Ongoing Struggle Against Crimes on Women
Roaring Festivities: West Bengal's Maha Ashtami Revelry
Building 'Green' Bonds: Eco-Conscious Durga Puja in West Bengal
Impending Downpour: IMD Warns West Bengal of Heavy Rainfall
Midnight Chaos Erupts Outside BJP Leader's Home in West Bengal