Judge Rules Against Trump on First Amendment Violation in Immigration Policy

A U.S. judge ruled against Trump's administration for unconstitutional actions targeting pro-Palestinian students and faculty. The administration's immigration policy was found to violate the First Amendment by chilling free speech, with officials using extreme measures to instill fear among pro-Palestinian advocates.


Devdiscourse News Desk | Updated: 01-10-2025 01:01 IST | Created: 01-10-2025 01:01 IST
Judge Rules Against Trump on First Amendment Violation in Immigration Policy
This image is AI-generated and does not depict any real-life event or location. It is a fictional representation created for illustrative purposes only.

In a landmark ruling on Tuesday, U.S. District Judge William Young declared that former President Donald Trump's administration acted unconstitutionally by targeting foreign students and faculty involved in pro-Palestinian advocacy.

Young's 161-page decision criticized the administration for violating the First Amendment rights of noncitizens, as part of a wider effort to limit free speech. The ruling came amidst a case filed by academic groups, challenging the immigration policies that led to visa revocations and arrests.

Despite legal setbacks, Trump's administration continued efforts to deport pro-Palestinian students. The case reflects broader tensions over free speech and immigration policy amid ongoing legal challenges.

(With inputs from agencies.)

Give Feedback