Supreme Court Allows Judicial Officers Entry as District Judges
The Supreme Court ruled that judicial officers with seven years of prior practice as advocates can be appointed as district judges in bar-reserved vacancies. The judgement calls for changes to state rules, fostering competition and talent in the judiciary, potentially impacting recruitment nationwide.

- Country:
- India
The Supreme Court announced a landmark judgement allowing judicial officers, who have completed seven years of advocacy before joining the bench, to be considered for district judge positions reserved for members of the bar.
In delivering the ruling, the court highlighted the need for a dynamic interpretation of the Constitution, emphasizing that a rigid approach could stifle judicial excellence.
With the verdict's potential impact on judicial recruitment, state governments, in consultation with high courts, have been directed to amend relevant rules within three months to align with the judgement.
(With inputs from agencies.)
Advertisement
ALSO READ
Eligibility for additional district judge: SC Constitution bench says interpretation of Constitution has to be organic and not pedantic.
Delhi's Mega Teacher Recruitment Drive: Over 5,300 Positions Available
AIFF's Financial Surplus and Constitutional Conundrum
Odisha SI Recruitment Scam: Arrests Highlight Corruption in Examination Process
Constitutional Integrity Under Threat: The Attack on CJI Gavai