Kejriwal Challenges Judiciary: AAP Leader's Bold Stance in High Court
Arvind Kejriwal, AAP chief, has decided not to participate in proceedings before Delhi High Court Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma, citing concerns over impartial justice in an excise case. Emphasizing justice's visibility, he prepares for a Supreme Court appeal, challenging bias and maintaining respect for judiciary.
- Country:
- India
Arvind Kejriwal, leader of the Aam Aadmi Party, has announced he will not engage in proceedings in the excise case before Delhi High Court Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma. In a letter, Kejriwal expressed unresolved concerns about impartiality and a miscarriage of justice.
Kejriwal, in his communication, emphasized the principle that justice should not only be done but also seen to be done, highlighting a perceived bias. He intends to approach the Supreme Court, iterating his decision respects judicial processes, not driven by ego or disrespect.
He also addressed broader judicial implications, maintaining respect for the institution while expressing doubts about receiving fair treatment in Judge Sharma's court. His stance, he insists, is not against the judiciary but focuses on ensuring impartial justice.
(With inputs from agencies.)
ALSO READ
Technology is the only effective answer to wastage of judiciary's time: CJI Surya Kant at Madhya Pradesh HC event.
ILO and Türkiye Strengthen Cooperation Between Labour Inspection and Judiciary to Improve Workers’ Rights Protection
AAP Celebrates Legal Triumph as Judge Steps Down from Excise Case
Justice Swarana K Sharma of Delhi HC says she is not recusing herself but the excise case will now be heard by another bench.

