Venezuela Challenges World Court's Authority Over Esequibo Dispute
Venezuela contested the International Court of Justice's jurisdiction over its century-old border dispute with Guyana. The conflict involves the Esequibo region, rich in oil. Guyana seeks to uphold an 1899 arbitration. Venezuela maintains negotiations are the solution, as Venezuelans recently rejected ICJ's role through a referendum.
At the United Nations World Court on Wednesday, Venezuela firmly rejected the court's jurisdiction in a longstanding territorial dispute with Guyana. The contested region, around the Esequibo river, is a vast territory rich in oil and gas resources.
This conflict, which originated with a 19th-century arbitration, has been officially brought before the International Court of Justice by Guyana, seeking to validate the border set by the 1899 decision in favor of British Guiana. Venezuela, however, argues that the decision was imposed under colonial pressure and emphasizes the need for bilateral negotiations.
The backdrop of a recent referendum in Venezuela, where ICJ's jurisdiction was rejected by its voters, highlights the complexity of this issue. Despite the ICJ's binding authority, its rulings depend on UN Security Council enforcement, leaving uncertainty as a decision approaches.
(With inputs from agencies.)
- READ MORE ON:
- Venezuela
- Guyana
- World Court
- Esequibo
- dispute
- border
- oil
- ICJ
- referendum
- territory
ALSO READ
UP: Dalit villagers object to Maharana Pratap Jayanti procession route, cops settle dispute
Chief Minister Suvendu Adhikari for observing 'West Bengal Day' on June 20, not Poila Baisakh chosen by Mamata
Markets have already 'factored in' lower GDP growth, higher inflation projections amid oil shock: Market analyst
JK Police reviews security preparedness along Indo-Pak border in Jammu
In legal dispute over 'The View', ABC argues Trump administration is trying to chill free speech

