Kabinet Kerfuffle: Karnataka's Controversial Cabinet Ranks Challenged

The Supreme Court rejected a challenge against Karnataka granting cabinet rank to 42 legislators. The petition claims this not only provides unnecessary financial benefits but also violates constitutional limits on government size. The petitioner was advised to seek a review in the high court.


Devdiscourse News Desk | New Delhi | Updated: 26-05-2026 13:04 IST | Created: 26-05-2026 13:04 IST
Kabinet Kerfuffle: Karnataka's Controversial Cabinet Ranks Challenged
This image is AI-generated and does not depict any real-life event or location. It is a fictional representation created for illustrative purposes only.
  • Country:
  • India

The Supreme Court declined to hear a petition against Karnataka's decision to award cabinet rank to 42 legislators on Tuesday. The bench, led by Chief Justice of India Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi, suggested that the petitioner pursue a review in the high court instead.

The petitioner, represented by senior advocate K Parameshwar, argued that conferring cabinet status provides financial benefits such as higher salaries and allowances, which he claims are funded through the consolidated fund of India. Additionally, this move allegedly violates Article 191 of the Constitution and leads to an unwarranted expansion of the government, conflicting with Article 164(1A).

The petition raised concerns over legislators seeking additional roles and perks, thus undermining legislative integrity and public trust. The Supreme Court advised that a review petition should be filed in the high court, emphasizing the need for full disclosure of personal interests when initiating public interest litigation.

(With inputs from agencies.)

Give Feedback