UPDATE 5-Britain unveils radical defence overhaul to meet new threats
Responding to U.S. President Donald Trump's insistence that Europe take more responsibility for its own security, Prime Minister Keir Starmer has pledged the largest sustained increase in British defence spending since the end of the Cold War. But with limited finances, the government's plan envisages making the army more lethal, not much larger, by learning from Ukraine, where drones and technology have transformed the battlefield.

Britain said on Monday it would radically change its approach to defence to address threats from Russia, nuclear risks and cyber-attacks by investing in drones and digital warfare rather than relying on a much larger army to engage in modern combat. Responding to U.S. President Donald Trump's insistence that Europe take more responsibility for its own security, Prime Minister Keir Starmer has pledged the largest sustained increase in British defence spending since the end of the Cold War.
But with limited finances, the government's plan envisages making the army more lethal, not much larger, by learning from Ukraine, where drones and technology have transformed the battlefield. Defence Secretary John Healey said Britain's adversaries were working more in alliance and technology was changing how war was fought.
"Drones now kill more people than traditional artillery in the war in Ukraine and whoever gets new technology into the hands of their armed forces the quickest will win," he said. Starmer commissioned a Strategic Defence Review shortly after he was elected in July, tasking experts including the former NATO boss, George Robertson, and a former Russia adviser to the White House, Fiona Hill, with formulating a plan for the next 10 years.
Despite cuts to the military budget in recent years, Britain still ranks alongside France as one of Europe's leading military powers, with its army helping to protect NATO's eastern flank and its navy maintaining a presence in the Indo-Pacific. But the army, with 70,860 full-time trained soldiers, is the smallest since the Napoleonic era and the government has said it needs to be reformed given the growing strategic threats.
James Cartlidge, defence policy chief for the opposition Conservatives, said the government had failed to prove it could finance the review's recommendations, meaning it had "dodged the big decisions". "An SDR (Strategic Defence Review) without the funding is an empty wish list," Cartlidge told lawmakers, many of whom criticised the government for not releasing the review first to parliament rather than to the media.
But Britain's biggest defence company BAE Systems welcomed the review, describing it in a statement as a "clear demand signal" for the defence sector to invest in capacity and develop technologies. NEW DEFENCE AGE
Under the plan accepted by the government, Britain will expand its fleet of attack submarines, which are nuclear-powered but carry conventional weapons, and will spend 15 billion pounds ($20.3 billion) before the next election, due in 2029, on the replacement of the nuclear warheads for its main nuclear fleet. It will build at least six new munitions plants, procure up to 7,000 British-made long-range weapons, and launch new communication systems for the battlefield.
A Cyber and Electromagnetic Command will lead defensive and offensive cyber capabilities, after British military networks faced more than 90,000 "sub-threshold" attacks in the last two years. But on the size of the armed forces, the review said it would not reduce numbers, even as a greater emphasis is put on technology, but would increase the total number of regular personnel when funding allowed. Healey said the number of full-time soldiers would reach 76,000 in the next parliament, likely after 2029.
"The moment has arrived to transform how we defend ourselves," Starmer told workers at BAE Systems' Govan shipbuilding site in Scotland, saying he would "end the hollowing out of our armed forces". "When we are being directly threatened by states with advanced military forces, the most effective way to deter them is to be ready," he said.
Starmer has already said defence spending would increase to 2.5% of GDP by 2027, from 2.3%, but critics and political opponents urged the government to put a date on when it would move to 3% of GDP. Reuters has previously reported that NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte wants members to raise defence spending to 3.5% of their GDP, and a further 1.5% on broader security-related items to meet Trump's demand for a 5% target.
Starmer said he was "100% confident" that British defence spending would hit 3% in the next parliament, likely between 2029 and 2034, something the review took into account when drafting its recommendations. The government described its policy as "NATO first", drawing on the strength of the alliance's members which meant it would never fight alone.
Starmer has sought to cast the higher defence spending as a way to create jobs and wealth, as he juggles severely strained public finances, a slow-growing economy and declining popularity among an increasingly dissatisfied electorate. The announcement about new submarines helped lift the share prices of defence groups Babcock, BAE and Rolls Royce .
($1 = 0.7386 pounds) (Writing by Kate Holton and Elizabeth Piper; additional reporting by William James, Muvija M and Paul Sandle; Editing by William Maclean, Alex Richardson and Cynthia Osterman)
(This story has not been edited by Devdiscourse staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
ALSO READ
Shangri-La Dialogue: A Convergence of Global Defence Perspectives
First batch of 17 women cadets passes out from Pune-based National Defence Academy, alongside over 300 male peers.
Breaking Barriers: First Female Graduates from National Defence Academy
European Shares Dip Amid U.S. Tariffs and Market Volatility
Big companies in defence sector coming to UP; production of AK203 rifle started in Amethi: PM Modi in Kanpur.