Supreme Controversy: U.S. High Court Greenlights Third-Country Deportations
The U.S. Supreme Court allowed the Trump administration to deport migrants to third countries without ensuring their safety, overturning a previous order. Justice Sotomayor dissented, stating this decision neglects due process. Critics argue this move strips essential protections, risking migrants' lives. Legal challenges against Trump's immigration policies continue.

The U.S. Supreme Court has approved President Trump's request to resume deporting migrants to third countries, eliminating a mandate to provide them a chance to explain potential harms they could face. This decision reverses an order by U.S. District Judge Brian Murphy, raising concerns among immigration advocates.
In a dissenting opinion, Justice Sonia Sotomayor criticized the ruling as a significant misuse of judicial power. She suggested that the court is more comfortable with potential suffering in obscure regions than addressing constitutional due process rights.
Immigrant rights groups, alongside the National Immigration Litigation Alliance, assert that this decision removes crucial protections. The administration argued that expedited removals are necessary for migrants with serious criminal records, citing diplomatic assurances for safety. The legal debate continues amidst ongoing challenges to Trump's immigration policies.
(With inputs from agencies.)
ALSO READ
Federal Judge Blocks Trump's Asylum Ban, Upholds Immigration Laws
UPDATE 3-Mexican boxer Chavez Jr arrested by US immigration officers, DHS says
Mexican Boxing Star Faces Immigration Hurdle
Divided US appeals court blocks enforcement of Texas state immigration law
Despite Tensions, India-Pakistan Trade Thrives Through Third Countries