Supreme Controversy: U.S. High Court Greenlights Third-Country Deportations

The U.S. Supreme Court allowed the Trump administration to deport migrants to third countries without ensuring their safety, overturning a previous order. Justice Sotomayor dissented, stating this decision neglects due process. Critics argue this move strips essential protections, risking migrants' lives. Legal challenges against Trump's immigration policies continue.


Devdiscourse News Desk | Updated: 24-06-2025 03:00 IST | Created: 24-06-2025 03:00 IST
Supreme Controversy: U.S. High Court Greenlights Third-Country Deportations
This image is AI-generated and does not depict any real-life event or location. It is a fictional representation created for illustrative purposes only.

The U.S. Supreme Court has approved President Trump's request to resume deporting migrants to third countries, eliminating a mandate to provide them a chance to explain potential harms they could face. This decision reverses an order by U.S. District Judge Brian Murphy, raising concerns among immigration advocates.

In a dissenting opinion, Justice Sonia Sotomayor criticized the ruling as a significant misuse of judicial power. She suggested that the court is more comfortable with potential suffering in obscure regions than addressing constitutional due process rights.

Immigrant rights groups, alongside the National Immigration Litigation Alliance, assert that this decision removes crucial protections. The administration argued that expedited removals are necessary for migrants with serious criminal records, citing diplomatic assurances for safety. The legal debate continues amidst ongoing challenges to Trump's immigration policies.

(With inputs from agencies.)

Give Feedback