Supreme Court Greenlights Mass Deportations Amid Controversy
The U.S. Supreme Court removed a judicial barrier, allowing President Trump’s administration to proceed with deporting migrants to third countries without assessing potential harm they might face. The court faced criticism from its liberal justices, emphasizing concerns about human rights and due process violations.

The United States Supreme Court gave the Trump administration the go-ahead on Monday to deport migrants to nations other than their own, bypassing assessments of the harm they might encounter there. This decision marks a significant victory for the administration's efforts to escalate deportations on a large scale.
This ruling notably prompted a strong dissent from the court's liberal wing, highlighting fears that the decision undermines core due process rights. Justice Sonia Sotomayor criticized the court's decision as a "gross abuse" of power, arguing it could subject thousands to potential violence in unstable regions.
The initial order requiring migrant assessment was issued by U.S. District Judge Brian Murphy after concerns arose about deportations to violent countries such as South Sudan. Despite the administration's assurances, rights groups warn of dangerous implications, citing a lack of critical protections for vulnerable migrants.
(With inputs from agencies.)
ALSO READ
UN Human Rights Council hears grim updates on Ukraine, Gaza and global racism
UPDATE 1-UN council rejects Eritrea's bid to end human rights probe
UN council rejects Eritrea's bid to end human rights probe
Legacy of Justice V R Krishna Iyer: A Crusader for Human Rights and Social Justice
Balochistan Abductions: Human Rights Group Accuses Pakistan of Enforced Disappearances