Legal Battle Intensifies Over Trump's Federal Grant Cancellations
Democratic state attorneys general have filed a lawsuit challenging a regulation used by the Trump administration to cancel federal grants. They argue this regulation unlawfully allows grants to be terminated based on new priorities, contradicting congressional authority. The lawsuit follows a recent court verdict supporting the argument against such terminations.

Democratic state attorneys general intensified their legal battle against the Trump administration's practice of using federal regulations to terminate grants, filing a new lawsuit on Tuesday. This litigation, launched in Boston federal court, involves attorneys general from 20 states, alongside Pennsylvania's governor, challenging the administration's regulation.
The contested regulation, adopted by the White House Office of Management and Budget in 2020, grants federal agencies the power to cancel grants that no longer align with program goals or agency priorities. Critics argue this has led to billions being cut from programs supporting diversity, equity, and climate change initiatives.
This lawsuit follows a recent court ruling in Boston that sided with Democratic states, declaring several grant cancellations illegal. The state attorneys general claim that the Trump administration exceeded its authority by overriding congressional funding decisions, emphasizing Congress's constitutional budgeting power.
(With inputs from agencies.)
ALSO READ
Revolutionizing Medical Education: New Regulations Unlock Faculty Potential
Delhi High Court Urges Regulation of Forensic Sample Testing
European Telecoms Unite Against EU Regulation Shift
Safety First: Strict Height Regulations Near Noida Airport
Semenya's Fight for Justice: Human Rights vs. Sporting Regulations