Trump's Executive Orders Under Legal Scrutiny
The Trump administration is appealing a federal judge's decision against an executive order targeting Perkins Coie, a law firm linked to Hillary Clinton. The case is heading to the U.S. Court of Appeals, potentially setting a precedent on presidential authority over law firms perceived as opposing the administration.
The Trump administration has announced its intention to appeal a federal ruling invalidating an executive order against the law firm Perkins Coie. The Department of Justice has filed a notice to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, challenging a May decision by Judge Beryl Howell.
Perkins Coie, associated with Hillary Clinton, was targeted in one of four similar executive orders aimed at law firms seen as adversarial to President Trump. The firm has publicly stated its readiness to present its case, highlighting the violation of constitutional freedoms by these orders.
The appeal stems from accusations that Perkins Coie engaged in activities to sway the 2016 election outcome. The executive orders, blocked by multiple judges, have raised questions about the appropriate use of presidential power in targeting legal entities.
ALSO READ
Justice Department Seeks to End Lawsuit on Naval Academy's Race-Conscious Admissions Policy
Battle Over Boeing's Billion-Dollar Deal: Families vs. Justice Department
Federal Judge Overturns Trump's Executive Order Against Law Firms
Justice Department Scrutinizes UC Faculty Diversity Hiring Practices
Bar Council of India Rebukes SILF Over Foreign Law Firms Entry
Google News