Operation Tandoor vs. Operation Sindoor: A Call for Decisive Action
In a fiery debate in Lok Sabha, Samajwadi Party MP Ramashankar Rajbhar criticized the government for its delayed response to the Pahalgam terror attack. He questioned the 17-day delay in launching Operation Sindoor, arguing that the country demanded a swifter and more aggressive response dubbed Operation Tandoor.
- Country:
- India
During a heated session in the Lok Sabha, Samajwadi Party MP Ramashankar Rajbhar expressed vehement criticism over the government's inaction following the Pahalgam terror attack. He stated that citizens expected a forceful response, referred to as Operation Tandoor, targeting the terrorists responsible.
Rajbhar highlighted a significant delay in the deployment of Operation Sindoor, which occurred a full 17 days post-attack, far beyond the initial expectation of three days. He pointedly questioned whether the operation effectively targeted those directly involved in the incident.
Commending societal unity against the terrorist agenda, Rajbhar acknowledged the solidarity displayed by Hindus and Muslims alike. Additionally, he referenced former US President Donald Trump's assertions about facilitating an India-Pakistan ceasefire, a claim he suggested raises questions about international intervention and influence.
(With inputs from agencies.)
ALSO READ
Colors of Courage: Chandranath Das's Tribute to the Himalayas and Operation Sindoor
Brahmos Missile: A Catalyst in Operation Sindoor and Global Demand
Brahmos Missile's Global Demand Soars Post Operation Sindoor
Railway Board to Conduct Comprehensive Census on Defence Wagons Post Operation Sindoor
Pak used unarmed drones, loiter munitions during Operation Sindoor; none could inflict damage to Indian military, civilian infra: CDS Chauhan.
Google News