Troops at the National Mall: An Unorthodox Approach to Crime Control
National Guard troops have been deployed in Washington's National Mall, raising questions about political motivations as crime rates are low. Their presence, more of a show of power than crime control, drew criticism. Locals in crime-heavy areas want more security, yet guards are stationed elsewhere.

Washington's National Mall, typically a nexus for tourists, has become an unusual sight with National Guard soldiers integrated into the everyday scene. These troops, sent from various states, are part of a federal initiative to bolster security and supposedly address rampant crime, though official statistics indicate a diminishment in criminal activities over the years.
The deployment has ignited controversy, particularly among Democratic leaders, who criticize it as a political maneuver rather than a genuine crime-fighting tactic. Mayor Muriel Bowser voiced her skepticism about the necessity of armed soldiers in such federalized city operations. Instead of engaging in arrests, the soldiers serve a protective role, ensuring safety for federal assets and law enforcement personnel.
While Trump's administration underscores their presence as essential for safety, the disconnection between troop locations and actual crime hotspots fuels debates. In Southeast Washington's Ward 8, an area plagued by criminal incidents, residents express frustration over the lack of visible security. This disconnect has led many to question the broader implications of such a militarized approach to domestic safety.
(With inputs from agencies.)