The Saga of Kilmar Abrego: A Symbol of Immigration Struggles
Kilmar Abrego, a migrant who became emblematic of the Trump administration's tough immigration stance, faces potential deportation to Uganda despite having no connections there. His lawyers argue against this action, highlighting the administration's coercive tactics, while his past deportation to El Salvador remains controversial.

Kilmar Abrego, who gained notoriety during President Donald Trump's rigorous immigration measures, finds himself in the spotlight once again. U.S. immigration officers detained him in Baltimore, and he now faces possible deportation to Uganda, a country with which he has no affiliations.
The Trump administration's attempt to deport Abrego, 30, to Africa marks a new chapter in a convoluted tale that began in March with his wrongful deportation to El Salvador. After returning to the U.S. and being released on bond, Abrego pled not guilty to charges involving migrant transportation.
Abrego, his family, and supporters rally against what they deem a misuse of presidential power that compromises due process. His lawyers challenge the government's logic, arguing over retaliatory deportation threats. As Abrego awaits a decision, his case underscores the national debate over immigration policy.
(With inputs from agencies.)
ALSO READ
Kilmar Abrego's Deportation Battle: A Case Against Immigration Policy
Uganda's Controversial Deal with US: Deportees for Economic and Political Gains?
First US Case of New World Screwworm Linked to El Salvador Travel
Kilmar Abrego's Legal Battle: A Symbol of Immigration Policy Controversy
Kilmar Abrego: A Symbol of Immigration Policy Challenges