Debating Wildlife Relocation and Protection: A Clash of Conservation Priorities

The Standing Committee of the National Board for Wildlife postponed decisions on community relocation to wildlife corridors and reclassifying rhesus monkeys under the Wildlife Protection Act, seeking further studies and consultations. Concerns include human-wildlife conflict and economic opportunities for communities, as well as differing state opinions on rhesus macaque protection.


Devdiscourse News Desk | New Delhi | Updated: 07-09-2025 09:46 IST | Created: 07-09-2025 09:46 IST
Debating Wildlife Relocation and Protection: A Clash of Conservation Priorities
This image is AI-generated and does not depict any real-life event or location. It is a fictional representation created for illustrative purposes only.
  • Country:
  • India

The Standing Committee of the National Board for Wildlife has delayed a crucial decision on policies involving the relocation of communities from wildlife corridors and the reclassification of the rhesus monkey under the Wildlife Protection Act. Seeking wider consultations, the committee emphasized the need for further study before moving forward with any policy extensions.

The proposal for voluntary community relocation aimed to enhance the resilience of protected areas by extending the current policy, limited to tiger reserves, to critical biodiversity areas and corridors. Advocates argue this could address ongoing human-wildlife conflicts, which threaten both human safety and livelihoods.

Discussions also covered the contentious inclusion of the rhesus macaque in the Wildlife Protection Act, with divided opinions among states. As a result, the committee will seek broader input from all states and union territories to shape future wildlife management strategies.

(With inputs from agencies.)

Give Feedback