Federal Judge Halts Cuts to Humanities Grants Amid Constitutional Concerns

A federal judge in Oregon has temporarily blocked the cancellation of National Endowment for the Humanities grants, calling the move likely unconstitutional. The injunction challenges President Trump's cost-cutting efforts and underscores the separation of powers, as Congress controls federal funding. The decision boosts efforts by humanities councils to restore funding.


Devdiscourse News Desk | Washington DC | Updated: 07-08-2025 06:23 IST | Created: 07-08-2025 06:23 IST
Federal Judge Halts Cuts to Humanities Grants Amid Constitutional Concerns
This image is AI-generated and does not depict any real-life event or location. It is a fictional representation created for illustrative purposes only.
  • Country:
  • United States

In a significant ruling, a federal judge in Oregon has issued an injunction temporarily halting the mass cancellation of National Endowment for the Humanities grants to councils nationwide. The judge deemed the cancellations potentially unconstitutional, offering a legal win for those opposing the cuts.

Judge Michael H. Simon, appointed by former President Barack Obama, announced that the plaintiffs' claims of unconstitutional action are likely to succeed. The judge cited the United States Constitution, which assigns the power of the purse to Congress, emphasizing that the executive branch's decision to withhold funds could be a deliberate violation of Congressional mandates.

The conflict arose in April when the National Endowment for the Humanities canceled several grants as part of President Donald Trump's budget-cutting strategy. The Federation of State Humanities Councils filed suit to reverse these decisions. Adam Davis, Executive Director of the Oregon Council for the Humanities, welcomed the ruling as a positive step towards community unity. The judge's stay prevents the government from reallocating the contested funds until the case is resolved.

(With inputs from agencies.)

Give Feedback