Kejriwal's Satyagraha Against Judiciary: Defying the Courtroom Drama

Arvind Kejriwal, leader of the Aam Aadmi Party, opts out of court proceedings in the Delhi excise policy case, alleging bias by Justice Swarana Kanta. Citing shattered hopes of justice, Kejriwal declares a Satyagraha stance, reserving the right to appeal to the Supreme Court.


Devdiscourse News Desk | Updated: 27-04-2026 10:35 IST | Created: 27-04-2026 10:35 IST
Kejriwal's Satyagraha Against Judiciary: Defying the Courtroom Drama
Aam Aadmi Party chief Arvind Kejriwal (File Photo/ANI). Image Credit: ANI
  • Country:
  • India

In a dramatic turn of events in the Delhi excise policy case, Aam Aadmi Party chief Arvind Kejriwal has chosen not to appear before the High Court, citing distrust in Justice Swarana Kanta. Party sources reveal that Kejriwal will neither make a personal appearance nor be represented by a lawyer, as he aligns with Mahatma Gandhi's principle of Satyagraha.

Kejriwal's decision follows the dismissal of his plea for Justice Swarana Kanta's recusal over perceived conflicts of interest, citing the judge's children's empanelment as Central Government counsel. Kejriwal stated his commitment to Satyagraha and mentioned the possibility of challenging Justice Kanta's verdict in the Supreme Court.

The High Court, led by Justice Sharma, dismissed Kejriwal's claims as conjecture, emphasizing that accusations need substantial proof. The court warned against turning courtrooms into 'theatres of perception' and underscored that powerful figures cannot undermine judicial institutions without evidence. The court also ordered the removal of related social media content.

(With inputs from agencies.)

Give Feedback