Legal Showdown: Susman Godfrey vs. Trump's Executive Order
Susman Godfrey, a U.S. law firm, seeks to permanently bar President Trump's executive order, alleging it retaliates against their defense actions in the 2020 election. The move is seen as an intimidation tactic against legal advocates. The case highlights ongoing legal conflicts over such presidential orders.
In a legal confrontation, the U.S. law firm Susman Godfrey challenges an executive order by former President Donald Trump. The firm asserts that the order, which restricts its government access without just cause, is a retaliatory act infringing on constitutional rights.
Judge Loren AliKhan, during a Washington hearing, questioned the Justice Department's justification for the order aimed at Susman Godfrey and similar firms. The controversy arises as Trump's previous executive actions against other law firms have been overturned.
The dispute highlights broader tensions as major law firms navigate political pressures while defending their clients, particularly in contentious cases linked to the integrity of the 2020 election.
(With inputs from agencies.)
ALSO READ
Marco Rubio Warns Iran: Retaliation Would Be a Grave Mistake
Yemen's Houthis Poised for Retaliation Against U.S.
Trump warns Tehran against retaliation against US, says Iran has choice between 'peace or tragedy', reports AP.
Iran's Potential Retaliation: Straits, Bases, and Nuclear Threats
Amid US Strikes, Iran Shifts Nuclear Assets: Anticipated Retaliation and Global Repercussions
Google News