Chief Justice's Authority: A Controversial Case Withdrawal

The Chief Justice of Punjab and Haryana High Court withdrew a case, citing the need to protect the institution's reputation. Complaints against Justice Mahabir Singh Sindhu prompted this decision. The Chief Justice asserted his uncontested authority over case allocation, emphasizing the move was to safeguard public trust in the judiciary.


Devdiscourse News Desk | Chandigarh | Updated: 24-05-2025 15:25 IST | Created: 24-05-2025 15:25 IST
Chief Justice's Authority: A Controversial Case Withdrawal
Chief Justice
  • Country:
  • India

The Chief Justice of the Punjab and Haryana High Court has made a controversial decision by withdrawing a case from one of its judges. This action, aimed at protecting the institution's reputation, follows complaints about Justice Mahabir Singh Sindhu. The move has stirred debate about judicial powers and integrity.

The Chief Justice argued that his authority to allocate or reassign cases is beyond judicial scrutiny. This power was exercised after receiving both oral and written complaints, necessitating immediate action to shield the court's esteem, according to the order.

Critics, however, raised concerns about this unilateral decision, especially as the case was already scheduled for judgment. Despite objections, the Chief Justice's prerogative as the master of the roster was upheld, highlighting the delicate balance between judicial authority and fairness.

(With inputs from agencies.)

Give Feedback