Supreme Court Steers Clear of D.C. Ammo Magazine Ban Challenge
The U.S. Supreme Court opted not to review a challenge to Washington D.C.'s ban on large-capacity ammunition magazines, which restricts devices holding more than 10 rounds. This decision leaves in place a lower court ruling that upheld the ban, asserting it does not violate the Second Amendment.
Devdiscourse News Desk | Washington DC | Updated: 07-06-2025 03:50 IST | Created: 07-06-2025 03:50 IST

- Country:
- United States
The U.S. Supreme Court chose not to hear a case challenging Washington D.C.'s restriction on large-capacity ammunition magazines. This ruling maintains the status quo, as the ban remains in effect.
The appeal was made by four men contesting a lower court's decision that upheld the city's Democratic-backed ban on magazines holding over 10 rounds. The court's decision left the ban intact.
The lower court had dismissed claims that the restriction infringes upon the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which protects the right to keep and bear arms.
(With inputs from agencies.)
Advertisement
ALSO READ
Trump Administration Faces Multiple Legal Challenges Amid Domestic Policy Actions
Legal Battle Over Federal Layoffs: Trump's Appeal Against Hiring Block
India's Diplomatic Offensive Against Terrorism: A Global Appeal
War-Crimes Whistleblower's Appeal Rejected: Australian Court Upholds Verdict
Supreme Court Declines Appeal on Controversial Gender T-Shirt