Supreme Court Bypasses Decision on D.C. Gun Magazine Restrictions
The U.S. Supreme Court opted not to hear a challenge against Washington, D.C.'s ban on large-capacity ammunition magazines. This decision maintains the lower court's ruling that the restriction does not violate the Second Amendment, despite past expansions of gun rights by the Supreme Court.

The U.S. Supreme Court has chosen not to take up a challenge to Washington, D.C.'s restriction on large-capacity ammunition magazines. This gives the high court an opportunity to further navigate gun rights, but the justices decided to leave the current ban intact.
Four individuals with concealed-carry licenses in D.C. sought to question whether the Second Amendment allows such a prohibition, arguing that the ban infringes on the right to 'keep and bear arms.' This group, however, faces a significant legal precedent set by the Supreme Court's expansion of gun rights in past decades.
The lower courts have consistently upheld similar firearm restrictions, indicating alignment with historic traditions of regulation. Recent court decisions have struggled to balance the expansion of the Second Amendment with maintaining public safety, leading to contentious national debates over gun control legislation.
(With inputs from agencies.)