Crucial Delhi High Court Rulings on Landmark Cases

Delhi High Court dealt with significant cases on July 3, including restraining Patanjali from airing ads against Dabur, rejecting Jacqueline Fernandez's plea in a money laundering case, and reviewing AIIMS' petition on a minor's pregnancy termination. Also, the court upheld a CRPF decision and discussed the outdated Delhi Rent Control Act.


Devdiscourse News Desk | New Delhi | Updated: 03-07-2025 19:30 IST | Created: 03-07-2025 19:30 IST
Crucial Delhi High Court Rulings on Landmark Cases
This image is AI-generated and does not depict any real-life event or location. It is a fictional representation created for illustrative purposes only.
  • Country:
  • India

On July 3, the Delhi High Court addressed several high-profile cases impacting various sectors. The court issued a restraint order against Patanjali, preventing the company from airing advertisements that disparage Dabur's Chyawanprash product. This crucial decision underscores the court's role in mediating commercial disputes.

In another significant ruling, the court denied Bollywood actor Jacqueline Fernandez's plea to cancel an FIR related to a money laundering case, signifying a firm stand against financial crime. Furthermore, AIIMS approached the court concerning an order permitting a minor rape survivor to terminate her pregnancy, indicating ongoing legal and ethical debates in such sensitive matters.

Other key decisions include the court upholding the CRPF's rejection of a company's bid to supply arms and discussing the obsolescence of the Delhi Rent Control Act. The day's proceedings highlight contentious issues in law and governance.

Give Feedback