Freedom or Folly? High Court Denies Bail Over Social Media Misuse

The Allahabad High Court rejected a bail plea from Ashraf Khan, accused of posting defamatory content against PM Modi and the Indian military. Justice Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal emphasized that freedom of speech doesn't include creating disharmony. The posts were allegedly made during an India-Pakistan military dispute.


Devdiscourse News Desk | Prayagraj | Updated: 03-07-2025 23:08 IST | Created: 03-07-2025 23:08 IST
Freedom or Folly? High Court Denies Bail Over Social Media Misuse
This image is AI-generated and does not depict any real-life event or location. It is a fictional representation created for illustrative purposes only.
  • Country:
  • India

The Allahabad High Court has denied bail to Ashraf Khan, accused of misusing social media by posting inflammatory content against Prime Minister Narendra Modi and the Indian military. The case underscores the ongoing debate over freedom of speech and its limits on social media platforms.

Justice Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal, in his judgment, highlighted that freedom of speech is constitutionally protected but does not cover actions that disrespect dignitaries and sow discord among the population. This ruling reflects concerns about social media's role in spreading misinformation and fostering public disharmony.

Khan allegedly posted edited videos depicting PM Modi negatively during a military standoff with Pakistan. Additional posts praised the Pakistani Air Force and mocked India's military capabilities. The state's counsel argued these actions undermined national unity, justifying the court's decision to refuse bail.

(With inputs from agencies.)

Give Feedback