ICE's Sweeping Detention Strategy Unveiled: Legal Challenges Mount
US Immigration and Customs Enforcement has adopted a broader detention policy under the Trump administration. This shift limits bond hearings, allowing for increased detention of illegal entrants. Critics argue this move, which uses a 1996 law, could lead to indiscriminate incarceration, while legal challenges loom over its implementation.

In a controversial policy shift, US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has dramatically increased its detention capabilities, tapping a legal authority to jail those who entered the country illegally, bypassing traditional bond hearings. This move, led by Acting Director Todd Lyons, takes immediate effect, sparking concerns over civil liberties and legal challenges.
The directive falls under the broader enforcement approach of the Trump administration, aiming to maximize the use of a 1996 law for detaining those previously permitted to remain free during immigration proceedings. Homeland Security claims this measure is necessary for national safety, citing substantial budget increases for immigration enforcement and detention facilities.
Critics, including immigration lawyers and rights advocates, argue that this policy risks indiscriminately detaining individuals who pose no threat, including long-term US residents with family roots. Legal experts forecast lawsuits challenging the administration's interpretation of the statute as ICE gears up to hold an unprecedented population, escalating potential human rights concerns.
ALSO READ
Federal judge blocks Trump administration from ending temporary legal status for many Haitians
Jaishankar holds talks with 3 top officials of Trump administration; focus on boosting ties in critical sectors
EU Prepares for All Trade Scenarios with Trump Administration
Supreme Court Upholds Trump Administration's Federal Workforce Downsizing
Federal Lawsuit Sparks Clash Over Egg Regulations Between Trump Administration and California